Zkillboard redhand code#

These changes are not the ones you want to make in order to increase the vulnerability of your foe in EVE - you have to throw out low hanging fruits that the effortless want to feed on that create vulnerable opportunities you can exploit - and this is not that, it’s quite the opposite. This is the whole issue - you’re pressuring these lumps of coals into diamonds you can’t scratch. No more capitals? That’s fine, they drop a cerb or muninn fleet or something that completely counters you. No matter what change you introduce, these guys are going to have the upper hand. The more changes like this you keep pushing for the more those dumb people disappear till you dry up the fishing hole into a group of pure polished pve+pvp types where you get dumpstered no matter what strategy you try. This, however, requires attention to detail and knowledge of your target area. Also some of the people at the party are over confident and do edgy risky ■■■■ that ultimately exposes them to significant vulnerabilities that can be capitalized on. The thing about EVE is the majority of players are dumb though, and you don’t see reactions with them, b/c they are dumb and not involved with the party. All corporations on this page are not associated with an alliance. So yes people over-react, just as people would over-react if they were at a house party with a bunch of friends and some guy comes in trying to fight everyone who nobody knows. I’m fairly confident I’m well rounded on this stuff.

Zkillboard redhand code#

Sign up Product Features Mobile Actions Codespaces Copilot Packages Security Code review Issues Discussions Integrations GitHub Sponsors.

GitHub - zKillboard/RedisQ: A simple queue service for 'pushing' killmails from zKillboard. I have also cloaky camped a region for almost an entire year straight without leaving. A simple queue service for 'pushing' killmails from zKillboard. I find it much more entertaining doing gimmicky hilarious stuff. I rarely use a capital, much less a super. I just enjoy doing this kind of stuff.This is me. I'm also not the authority on rankings nor should I (or zkb) be the one you rely on as to whether or not you have enough pvp epeen. Is this the right way to do ranks? Hell if I know, but it's a method I've come up with through extensive trials and testing. Now, before you any of you get your autistic panties in a bunch, I'm not a statistician, nor do I want to be. It wasn't until a few weeks ago that I switched the weekly rankings to use the same method. I should also mention that the recent and alltime rankings on zkb have always used the above method. Final Blow by Glasgow Dunlop (The Dark Space Initiative) flying in a Moros. I've tweaked that a bit, and may tweak it some more. RedHand (Lazerhawks) lost their Thanatos in J164430 (E-R00024). r/EVE is a place to discuss internet spaceships. Until recently those who ganked lots of freighters were finding themselves higher in ranking. As others have said just Patreon it zKillboard is an incredibly valuable source of record gathering for the game, and there are A LOT of people who would be willing to donate to keep those records accessible. And that is why you don't see folks with 768 Ibis kills ranked at #1 anymore, their points and isk killed values are too low.

Those with a lower score have better ranks. This score is then assigned to its own Redis sorted set.

I then calculate a score that includes your efficiency in each category based on the following code: $avg = ceil(($shipsDestroyedRank + $iskDestroyedRank + $pointsDestroyedRank) / 3)

Then, with higher values having better rank, and Rank 1 being best, the rank of an entity in each set is determined and assigned to their respective parameters. First, your kills, isk, and points are all added into their own Redis sorted sets. I've made some changes a few weeks ago that take much more than just the kills you've had in the last week into consideration. Alright, so I've gotten a few complaints from those who are bothered that the weekly rankings on zkillboard are no longer based on the number of kills in a descending order.